3 replies to this topic

[Bard]

Of course you'd have to have played it to get it... somebody here must play.

[SJL]

Of course you'd have to have played it to get it... somebody here must play.

These Hitler videos show a strange aspect of Hitler losing all sacredness... and in a twist, it makes him look boyish as in a bad gamer. So the propaganda wants to twist a portrayal of humble child capitalist not needing sacredness, while the real Hitler was a narcissist who won admiration from communists for embodying this arrogance of "sacredology" - now imitated by a Musolinian administration and regimes around the world.

The world of gaming is full of interesting characters, and World of Warcraft is one notably abnoxious one.

Starcraft is alright.

[Apollo5600]

I don't play, but I watch people play it on You Tube. Husky Starcraft is quite entertaining, and the matches apparently involve a great deal of strategic depth. Different types of units counter each other, and they discuss "Micro" and "Macro" strategy, that is strategy that happens up close, and overall strategy with certain building orders and counters. The South Koreans are apparently the best in the world and have their own television channels dedicated to it. They have an average of 150 clicks a minute on the screen. They get paid big bucks over there, apparently.

I would love to play, but simply can't justify the investment of time it would take to become good at it. I have full time school and full time work, and if I had the free time I'd rather study Chess or Go. Go is the supreme strategic board game, better than chess ever was for me (and I won a few tournaments when I was younger, though I probably don't know how to play it now).

[Bard]

Animated speed chess in a 2d isometric enviroment. sort of