Jump to content


Photo

President Obama


  • Please log in to reply
673 replies to this topic

#601 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 14 June 2012 - 11:23 PM

BBQ Ribs, Hamburgers, Hot dogs, Eggs, Ice cream, and bakery stuff. I just watched a slide show of the food the president shoves down his gullet and marveled at the hypocrisy and all, as Michele and one of the daughters were in the background of one of these "health food." meals. The best part is the financial capital center of America now setting forth mayoral edicts on how people should consume their calories. Cannot wait until liberal enablers get their daily cup o' gruel ration in the reeducation camp and then they can ruminate on all the "conservative hysteria" that the commies were coming.

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.


#602 907ie

907ie

    Member

  • Members
  • 308 posts

Posted 19 June 2012 - 08:55 AM

Very good, Jeff.
However, I doubt there will be more than just a few of these Liberal Enablers left, even in the reeducation camps. And come on, everyone KNOWS Communism was defeated back in the 80-90s!
Our problems are totally the result of not spending enough on Federal Social Programs for Illegal Immigrants, of the working man not contributing his fair share for the common good. He should be working OT to give the Feds more money, not contributing his time to the Church to help out in a private soup kitchen. Such unregulated activity! My goodness, what if he actually helped a homeless minority amputee female veteran of foreign wars outside the official system?

Sheesh, when will people get it, that the Government knows best? NOT!

#603 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 22 June 2012 - 08:20 PM

Add this to economists terms for past fiscal policies:" Gimme economics." As currently practiced by the current administration.

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.


#604 SJL

SJL

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,363 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 June 2012 - 04:34 PM

Liberals are used to these shallow inconsequential domination games like Jersey Shore. THe liberal GOP also believes it is ok to let the girl power fly around. They do not realize that this is a mentality of sin meant to turn us into wall-less individuals. Remember Pink Floyd: at first we thought it was about freedom from the state, but now it comes as accepting no wall of protection from any form of abuse, be it from the state or foreign invaders, and, heck, even the state is being soothed into corruption and unwalling itself and the country altogether from defenses.



Truly, things like Obamacare are a metaphorical extention of conditioning the American people to lower our defense spending - care less about health care dispensation altogether.



This is how this nasty KGB strategy works.



The demand of submission by Nazi domination is the flip side of the Communist demand of submission by acting "humane" and "submissive" through and through.



If only we were all submissive to the intellectual, then the dummy intellectual could rule easily and figure it all out for the rest of us in fair manner. That is the folly of Obama and "gentle savage retard" theory expounded in feminine popular shows such as Forrest Gump or what not.



#605 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 11 July 2012 - 07:40 PM

In Miami Florida on Tuesday 10th of July 2012. Michele Obama, the wife of the president told the crowd in attendance to continue their "Treachorous work"
That is a direct quote from her speech. Hopefully some in attendance knew what the definition of "Treachorous" is.

Now to those who would have ears: Has he ever told the truth? Except that he was going to fundamentaly change America. last time I checked treachery was akin to treason and deception.

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.


#606 WmWallace

WmWallace

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • 2,977 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 July 2012 - 12:41 AM

Scary.

#607 goodcomdeadcom

goodcomdeadcom

    Member

  • Members
  • 336 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Greetings, and God bless. I am William, in Idaho Occupation: Welding. Hobbies: Reading, singing in the church choir and three-gun patrol shooting. Bio: Army brat, ex-Navy, former rabid secular humanist, current junior high Sunday school teacher and just glad to be alive and in the service of my Lord and Savior Jesus, the Christ.

Posted 15 July 2012 - 10:42 PM

Greetings, and God bless.

I wasn't quit sure where to put this, but seeing as how it delves into the ATF gun running affair known as "Fast and Furious" and that affair is an artifact of the Obama administration I settled for placing it in this thread. Admin may decide otherwise with no objection from me.

What I'm actually addressing here is "Stratfor Global Intelligence". I see them cited here now and then. I don't know much about them; until now I assumed they were reasonably credible. They have weighted in on "Fast and Furious". I don't know how closely (or not) individuals on this board have been following that nasty little affair, but Stratfors' take on the whole thing is causing me to re-examine my assumptions about them.They seem to have wholly adopted the Obama Administrations demonstrably fictitious version of reality on the issue.

Linked below, from Sipsy Street, is an analysis of the Stratfor report on "Fast and Furious", with links to Stratfor. As I said, it is causing me to take a closer look at what I thought of Stratfor.

http://sipseystreeti...-stratfors.html
Soylent Green Is Sheeple!!!

#608 Guest_That One Guy_*

Guest_That One Guy_*
  • Guests

Posted 16 July 2012 - 04:40 AM

Greetings, and God bless.

I wasn't quit sure where to put this, but seeing as how it delves into the ATF gun running affair known as "Fast and Furious" and that affair is an artifact of the Obama administration I settled for placing it in this thread. Admin may decide otherwise with no objection from me.

What I'm actually addressing here is "Stratfor Global Intelligence". I see them cited here now and then. I don't know much about them; until now I assumed they were reasonably credible. They have weighted in on "Fast and Furious". I don't know how closely (or not) individuals on this board have been following that nasty little affair, but Stratfors' take on the whole thing is causing me to re-examine my assumptions about them.They seem to have wholly adopted the Obama Administrations demonstrably fictitious version of reality on the issue.

Linked below, from Sipsy Street, is an analysis of the Stratfor report on "Fast and Furious", with links to Stratfor. As I said, it is causing me to take a closer look at what I thought of Stratfor.

http://sipseystreeti...-stratfors.html


I unsubscribed from that website about two years ago. Namely, when Friedman had a new book coming out he recommended that the US dump all ties with Israel. He has close ties to this current administration and Obama's ear. It's enough for me and I don't trust Stratfor one bit. I won't read another article there again or link anything Stratfor related to my site.

Disinformation or not, and regardless of some articles having merit, there is bad intention. It's a distraction for geopolitical junkies who think they're getting the real news of the day when in fact they're merely being told to "look over there" until the next shiny object (distraction) appears.

In other words, it's the non-news factory of geopolitics that continiously sends people on ghost chases.

#609 goodcomdeadcom

goodcomdeadcom

    Member

  • Members
  • 336 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Greetings, and God bless. I am William, in Idaho Occupation: Welding. Hobbies: Reading, singing in the church choir and three-gun patrol shooting. Bio: Army brat, ex-Navy, former rabid secular humanist, current junior high Sunday school teacher and just glad to be alive and in the service of my Lord and Savior Jesus, the Christ.

Posted 16 July 2012 - 10:54 PM

Greetings, and God bless.

Copy that, TOG. Thanks for the feedback.
Soylent Green Is Sheeple!!!

#610 SJL

SJL

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,363 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 July 2012 - 08:03 AM

Seems like NAFTA is what brought all those CNC machines for drug cartels in Mexico. Indeed, lack of border inspection and taxation is the biggest problem. The enemy is taking advantage of this and the populace is being taxed instead.

As I had previously said, these taxes amount to export taxes, all made illegal by the Founding Fathers after the problems of corruption with the British.

Some never learn. This globalization has been hijacked by the Perestroika deception and has been deviated into another round of surrenderism, but this time it is even worse than when under the British.

#611 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 06 August 2012 - 09:55 PM

If true this revelation might be too little too late if not acted upon by all concerened with legitimacy.

Source: The Blaze



Wayne Allyn Root is a former Libertarian vice presidential nominee. He now serves as Chairman of the Libertarian National Campaign Committee.

Statement from Mr. Root:


"I am President Obama’s classmate at Columbia University, Class of ’83. I am also one of the most accurate Las Vegas oddsmakers and prognosticators. Accurate enough that I was awarded my own star on the Las Vegas Walk of Stars. And I smell something rotten in Denmark. Obama has a big skeleton in his closet. It’s his college records. Call it “gut instinct” but my gut is almost always right. Obama has a secret hidden at Columbia- and it’s a bad one that threatens to bring down his presidency. Gut instinct is how I’ve made my living for 29 years since graduating Columbia.
Obama and his infamous strategist David Axelrod understand how to play political hardball, the best its ever been played. Team Obama has decided to distract America’s voters by condemning Mitt Romney for not releasing enough years of his tax returns. It’s the perfect cover. Obama knows the best defense is a bold offense. Just keep attacking Mitt and blaming him for secrecy and evasion, while accusing him of having a scandal that doesn’t exist. Then ask followers like Senator Harry Reid to chase the lead. The U.S. Senate Majority Leader appears to now be making up stories out of thin air, about tax returns he knows nothing about. It’s a cynical, brilliant and vicious strategy. Make Romney defend, so he can’t attack the real Obama scandal.
This is classic Axelrod. Obama has won several elections in his career by slandering his opponents and leaking sealed documents. Not only do these insinuations and leaks ruin the credibility and reputation of Obama’s opponents, they keep them on the defensive and off Obama’s trail of sealed documents.

By attacking Romney’s tax records, Obama’s socialist cabal creates a problem that doesn’t exist. Is the U.S. Senate Majority Leader making up stories out of thin air? You decide. But the reason for this baseless attack is clear- make Romney defend, so not only is he “off message” but it helps the media ignore the real Obama scandal.
My answer for Romney? Call Obama’s bluff.
Romney should call a press conference and issue a challenge in front of the nation. He should agree to release more of his tax returns, only if Obama unseals his college records. Simple and straight-forward. Mitt should ask “What could possibly be so embarrassing in your college records from 29 years ago, that you are afraid to let America’s voters see it? If it’s THAT bad, maybe it’s something the voters ought to see.” Suddenly the tables are turned. Now Obama is on the defensive.
My bet is that Obama will never unseal his records because they contain information that could destroy his chances for re-election. Once this challenge is made public, my prediction is you’ll never hear about Mitt’s tax returns ever again.
Why are the college records, of a 51-year-old President of the United States, so important to keep secret? I think I know the answer.
If anyone should have questions about Obama’s record at Columbia University, it’s me. We both graduated (according to Obama) Columbia University, Class of ’83. We were both (according to Obama) Pre-Law and Political Science majors. And I thought I knew most everyone at Columbia. I certainly thought I’d heard of all of my fellow Political Science majors. But not Obama (or as he was known then- Barry Soetoro). I never met him. Never saw him. Never even heard of him. And none of the classmates that I knew at Columbia has ever met him, saw him, or heard of him.
But don’t take my word for it. Fox News randomly called 400 of our Columbia classmates and never found one who had ever met Obama.
Now all of this mystery could be easily and instantly dismissed if Obama released his Columbia transcripts to the media. But even after serving as President for 3 1/2 years he refuses to unseal his college records. Shouldn’t the media be as relentless in pursuit of Obama’s records as Romney’s? Shouldn’t they be digging into Obama’s past–beyond what he has written about himself–with the same boundless enthusiasm as Mitt’s?
The first question I’d ask is, if you had great grades, why would you seal your records? So let’s assume Obama got poor grades. Why not release the records? He’s President of the free world, for gosh sakes. He’s commander-in-chief of the U.S. military. Who’d care about some poor grades from three decades ago, right? So then what’s the problem? Doesn’t that make the media suspicious? Something doesn’t add up.
Secondly, if he had poor grades at Occidental, how did he get admitted to an Ivy League university in the first place? And if his grades at Columbia were awful, how’d he ever get into Harvard Law School? So again those grades must have been great, right? So why spend millions to keep them sealed?
Third, how did Obama pay for all these fancy schools without coming from a wealthy background? If he had student loans or scholarships, would he not have to maintain good grades?
I can only think of one answer that would explain this mystery.
Here’s my gut belief: Obama got a leg up by being admitted to both Occidental and Columbia as a foreign exchange student. He was raised as a young boy in Indonesia. But did his mother ever change him back to a U.S. citizen? When he returned to live with his grandparents in Hawaii or as he neared college-age preparing to apply to schools, did he ever change his citizenship back? I’m betting not.
If you could unseal Obama’s Columbia University records I believe you’d find that:
A) He rarely ever attended class.
B) His grades were not those typical of what we understand it takes to get into Harvard Law School.
C) He attended Columbia as a foreign exchange student.
D) He paid little for either undergraduate college or Harvard Law School because of foreign aid and scholarships given to a poor foreign students like this kid Barry Soetoro from Indonesia.
If you think I’m “fishing” then prove me wrong. Open up your records Mr. President. What are you afraid of?
If it’s okay for U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to go on a fishing expedition about Romney’s taxes (even though he knows absolutely nothing about them nor will release his own), then I think I can do the same thing. But as Obama’s Columbia Class of ’83 classmate, at least I have more standing to make educated guesses.
It’s time for Mitt to go on the attack and call Obama’s bluff."

(Only hyperlinks were edited out of this text)

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.


#612 Ipcress

Ipcress

    Member

  • Members
  • 46 posts

Posted 07 August 2012 - 12:54 AM

Speaking of Obama's murky past, our friend Trevor Loudon and his gang have done a remarkably good job of digging up a lot of new information and connecting some very important dots. In fact, there's so much to process it's mentally overwhelming. If you haven't seen these two pieces, take the time to read them now:

"The Most Important Press Conference Ever Held at Any Time in U.S. History"

Part I:
http://www.rightside...ory-part-i.html

Part II:
http://www.trevorlou...istory-part-ii/


Personally, I don't think we've yet seen everything Obama has up his sleeve. The communists have literally worked for decades to put one of their guys in the White House, and my gut feeling is that they're not going to waste this ultimate opportunity. I fear the worst is yet to come.

Consider for a moment the chilling fact that Obama is Commander-in-Chief of the United States military, and could order a strike on Iran (or any number of places) that would immediately set into effect the terrifying chain of events we've been discussing here for years. America would come off as the arrogant oppressor by nuking the little guy, and the noble commies would have to step in and save the world from us. All Obama has to do is make some audacious military move, and the last piece in the puzzle falls into place.

Maybe I'm crazy, but I can't shake the feeling that Obama's main purpose is to engage the USA in a hot war that we are in no way prepared for. I'm starting to think that this possibility is infinitely more important than the debate over why his school records are sealed.

#613 Guest_That One Guy_*

Guest_That One Guy_*
  • Guests

Posted 23 August 2012 - 07:10 AM

Ever wonder why the Obama admin continues to keep a VP that doesn't know his a** from a hole in the ground?

It's strategy.

Even if it's from some unwitting blogger who is one piece of information away from realizing it's the Soviet machine, which also has a man in the Oval Office, here's some great perspective.

Meet the highest ranking useful idiot in American history:

Monday, August 20, 2012

The Scarecrow of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog 21 CommentsIt is not completely impossible that in a moment of electoral desperation, Joseph Robinette Biden Jr will be called into a private meeting with Valerie Jarrett and David Axelrod and told that it's time for him to announce that he wants to spend more time with his family. But it's not very likely.

Posted Image



The chief function of a Vice President is making the President look good and by that measure Joe Biden is one of the best vice presidents who ever lived. The rule of thumb is that the more incompetent the man at the top is, the more of a buffoon the man just below him needs to be to make him look good. And again Biden does this job brilliantly.


James Monroe put as many political rivals in his cabinet as possible, but Barack Hussein Obama and the people around him are too insecure and paranoid to do such a thing. Monroe might have presided over the Era of Good Feeling, but the age of O is the Era of Bad Feelings. Hillary Clinton was never going to be on the ticket. Even giving her the Secretary of State position would never have been an option if it had not been a matter of pure survival, with the Obamas terrified of losing moderate Democrats to McCain.

Joe Biden, never a serious candidate, was the perfect match for Obama. A dumb old white man, to confirm all the dirty impulses of the left, while mockingly giving mainstream Democrats someone they could relate to. Biden's gaffes aren't an embarrassment, they are the whole point, signaling the end of the old American era of leadership. Their implicit message is that you can choose a McCain or Biden, another old white man, or the savvy multicultural representative of a new generation that looks like the America of 2050.

Obama and Biden are both symbols of the Post-American America. Biden represents the outgoing American administration and Obama represents the incoming Post-American administration. It is vital to make the American administration look weak, foolish and useless so as to affirm the right of the Post-American administration to seize power from it.

Biden's ego has made it impossible for him to understand the uses he has been put to. And that is part of the joke. Joe Biden wasn't selected despite his penchant for saying stupid things in public. He was selected because of it. He is there to project incompetence in order to make Obama look better. He is there to make the idea of white male leadership look like a joke. That is his one and only job and he has succeeded at it.

Biden is the successor of every dumb white male father figure on TV gawping at the screen, tumbling over chairs and down the stairs, scratching his head cluelessly at the wiser new generation around him. He is every man in a commercial who can't figure out how to start a car, make coffee or clean the house until his wife or a helpful minority figure shows up and explains it to him.

Doofus Dad is no longer just unable to perform simple tasks in a commercial, rubbing his eyes to the sound of canned laughter. He is the Vice President of the United States who was chosen to live up to that calculatingly manufactured stereotype. And he is rubbing his eyes and saying stupid things to the sound of canned laughter at press conferences.

No halfway responsible man would have deliberately chosen an idiot as his potential replacement. But an administration that has done the things to America that this one has done is not in any way responsible. If you step into Obama's head for a moment, you realize that he does not care at all what happens if he should die. A man who can't be bothered to take care of his own extended family is not likely to care one way or another what happens to a country of several hundred million, most of whom are not even related to him.

Posted Image



Obama truly is a post-racial candidate. His tribalism is a feint. While African-Americans saw him as one of theirs, he has never seen himself that way. His racial identity is as much a scam as anything else about him. Obama has done as much for African-Americans as he has for his half-brother who is calling strangers to help pay his medical bills. Obama dispenses group privileges only when it suits his needs. He exploits accusations of racism, but race means very little to him. Racial identity, like national identity, is a pose that he adopts on the appropriate occasions.


The post-racialism of Obama is the reverse of Martin Luther King's invocation of a society that has transcended race. Obama privileges race over character as a means of invoking guilt and group solidarity. He does not care about all Americans in a way that transcends race, nor does he care about one race exclusively. He cares about no one at all. If he appears to have any warm feelings for a particular group, they seem to be limited to the Muslims of his childhood who helped raise him.

There is nothing reassuring or transcendent about Obama's post-racialism. Like his post-nationalism, it is a symptom of a man who belongs nowhere but who can do his best to pass everywhere by appropriating identities and symbols as if they were currencies to be traded on an international trip. A man such as this is adept at speaking on more than one level, at sending coded messages that say different things to different people in a single word.

To moderate liberals, the selection of Biden sends a message that race has finally been transcended through the hard work of men and women like them. To the left, the message is that the old patriarchy is on the way out and is about to be replaced by a multicultural people's leadership that knows what a ridiculous joke the old white male power structure is. The left is not at all troubled when Republicans ridicule Biden. They chuckle because Republicans aren't in on the joke. Biden is meant to be them. They are Biden.

The left harbors its greatest contempt, not for Republicans, but for liberals. "I love Harry and Sidney and Sammy/I hope every colored boy becomes a star/But don't talk about revolution/That's going a little bit too far," Phil Ochs sang mockingly. "Love me, love me, I'm a liberal." Obama's people are singing Phil Ochs' song and displaying the traditional contempt for all the parts of the Democratic Party that aren't as committed to revolution as they are.

Biden is a joke because the Democratic Party is a joke. He represents what the left sees as the flaws of the Democratic Party and liberalism, the old white males who wanted slow reforms and gradual change instead of abrupt revolution. Obama's people could have chosen a more credible figure who would have provided useful cover, but instead they couldn't hold back their contempt.

Posted Image




That arrogance and contempt are the greatest flaws of the men and women looking down at the world from the capital city of the enemy nation that they have finally seized. They could replace Biden, they should replace Biden, but they probably won't. Their revolutionary ideals are fueled by their egotism. They want to overthrow everything not because they care about everyone, as they claim to, but because they truly don't care about anyone at all. Not only don't they care, but they feel nothing but contempt for the people looking up at them, pleading for jobs or tax relief. And it shows.

To the left race is a means to an end, it is not the end. Its collectivism requires enlisting individual groups dissatisfied with the system to help overthrow it in a coalition whose ultimate aims do not serve the needs of any of the individual groups. The racial identity of millions of African-Americans is a tool, like the former Senator from Delaware who somewhere beneath his hairpiece, past nerves deadened by Botox injections, harbors dreams of inheriting the job in 2016.

Biden still does not understand what he is. He is a fellow traveler, a dupe, a scarecrow of the old white male liberal establishment hung up over a cornfield to attract unknowing liberals while serving as a figure of fun to the left. And despite his corruption and arrogance, there is something sad and pathetic in the spectacle of a hollow man with capped teeth set in a grin making a fool of himself for the amusement of the Post-American crowd. A crowd that he thinks are laughing with him, when they are actually laughing at him.



#614 SJL

SJL

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,363 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 August 2012 - 08:57 AM

I like the way the author mentions the race war as a mean to both divide, demoralize and collectivize, which is quite different than Hitler's way that was less sophisticated.

Another thing of Perestroika deception is the word conservative, which I believe is a term invented by the reds and passed to the media, making us look anti industry and anti trade backwards. It's interesting how communists reserve themselves the nice words like production and other buzz techy stuff, while associating the ones they are afraid of and who could take off with more depressing words like conservative, when the opposite in "spirit", so to speak, is truer. Abortion is born of fear and conservation, instead of a drive to survive and transcend the waste of the self through capitalistic mass and cheap production.

And, thus, Perestroika deception works also in that sense of making us look as the evil fascisto commies while they take the more reasonable and modern approach. But we all know they are not serious, because, at the bottom, their tack is full of pseudo-adult vanity wannabe.

Even the way Romney jokes about Obama being born abroad seem to be something of a cynical gesture: "make the conservatives happy about themselves and strong, ha ha ha, fool them about their self belief in being true American blood born men, turning them into jingoists"... this whole thing is devious and sick and maniacal, twisted. The sort of intelligence which shadowed Christ, following Him everywhere, copying His insights, before crushing Him in secret when away from benefiting crowds, and yet later gloating like that Roman soldier, for getting the final kill with the spear, as some kind of grotesque trophy of a killer. It's crazy how some crazies out there hide their craziness.

#615 SJL

SJL

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,363 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 25 August 2012 - 09:45 AM

Another survey seem to indicate also that PC brainwashed and islamic two face discipline works well since 911 because the "likes" of a mulsim vs. a "conservative christian" in American cities, and even NYC, is like 3 to 2 (over 10).

#616 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 27 August 2012 - 04:16 PM

I have on very good authority that an edict from the oval office(ski) Mini-kremlin; Is that the Czarina has decreed a limitation of only 750 calories at lunch in Amerikanski public schools. Not being married to a boy who pursued athletics, she would not understand the caloric needs of juvenile males who burn up calories sitting in class merely staring at attractive females. (Normal young man behavior.) The children are accustomed to standing in long lines already (So meager handouts: "And be thankful!") Is their lot in life.

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.


#617 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 27 August 2012 - 04:24 PM

The 2000 calorie per day RDA is a guideline for people whose activity is just above a sedentary level. These freaks are creating a generation of "Hunger games" youth. People do very stupid things when hungry. (And are also easier to control.) But the generation will be dependent on "handouts."

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.


#618 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 27 August 2012 - 04:33 PM

Obama and the forthcoming "food embargo" against American citizens.


All he requires is one little "national security emergency." Martial law, to follow.......and all the power he needs.

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.


#619 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 27 August 2012 - 04:40 PM

This lunatic would hypocritically attend a "Luau" and reminisce on his boyhood days of roasted pig and poi, and then stuff another rib in his mouth. As with all despots, the law "applies to the people only." He "sees the bigger picture."

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.


#620 Jeffboyrd

Jeffboyrd

    Member

  • Members
  • 485 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States

Posted 27 August 2012 - 04:44 PM

I have posted about half a dozen rants about their food "hypocrisy" here. The point that any reader should get is that food,water, and weapons are the totalitarian trump card to a successful uprising against their rule. Perhaps that is why Soros is so heavily invested in Agribusiness.

Gods, and Generals hold men's fate in their grasp.