Jump to content


Photo

JR Nyquist's Latest


  • Please log in to reply
459 replies to this topic

#341 Jason

Jason

    Member

  • Members
  • 170 posts

Posted 29 December 2010 - 08:21 PM

No new article from JRN last week. It's not terribly unusual for him to be late a day or two, but I don't recall him ever taking more than that. Anyone heard from him?

#342 Apollo5600

Apollo5600

    Member

  • Members
  • 994 posts

Posted 29 December 2010 - 11:18 PM

Yeah, but we had Christmas not too long ago. I don't think the Russians got him..... yet.

#343 kulthur

kulthur

    Member

  • Members
  • 348 posts

Posted 02 January 2011 - 10:51 AM

http://www.financial...war?q=node/3601

Posted Thursday.

#344 907ie

907ie

    Member

  • Members
  • 311 posts

Posted 07 January 2011 - 08:39 PM

Origins of a Killer State

http://www.financial...-a-killer-state

This is a real gem, don't just read it, study it!

"The distribution of military power is the key."

#345 JNKish

JNKish

    Member

  • Members
  • 240 posts

Posted 08 January 2011 - 09:28 AM

Origins of a Killer State

http://www.financialsense.com/contributors...-a-killer-state

This is a real gem, don't just read it, study it!

"The distribution of military power is the key."

It is my opinion that this sentiment (This is a real gem, don't just read it, study it!) may be applied to both recent articles - WILL RUSSIA KEEP THE TREATY? and ORIGINS OF A KILLER STATE.
I created the following blog post with the intent of combining and amplifying the importance of these two articles. Great work Mr. Nyquist.
Diagnosis - Mercury Poisoning - For Former KGB Exposing Russian Military Mafia System Of Ruling Elite

#346 Legolas

Legolas

    Member

  • Members
  • 103 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 January 2011 - 02:52 PM

I agree wholeheartedly with both of you, 907ie and JNKish. These two latest articles of Jeff's are two of the most revelatory and revelant that I can remember reading in a long time. I remember years ago when TFP was on the old discussion board that we would debate whether the Russian leadership was driven primarily by the ideology of Marxism/socialism or by the basic lust for power and conquest. Victor Kalashnikov's uniquely qualified ideas and analysis on this subject puts the issue to rest, I believe.

Perhaps from the very beginning, Russian leadership realized the initial blush of ideological fervor could not carry the Revolution very far into actual implementation without the heavy-handed encouragement of the Cheka, the secret police. People do not react favorably when they're told they no longer own their land, or any other property. Marxism/socialism never did have anything to offer the world in practical terms, just vague promises about a workers' paradise, while delivering an actual hell on earth. If a nation basically has nothing to "sell" that anyone wants to "buy", how can it prosper or even survive the inevitable "bankruptcy"? This is why its military and its military's strategy can be the only source of survival and power for the Russian State. As Kalashnikov has pointed out, the continuity of mindset between Soviet leaders and Russian leaders shows us what the Russian State will do to survive and prosper. Nothing has changed since the overt phase of the Cold War except America's suicidal urge to abandon national security.

#347 SJL

SJL

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,371 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 January 2011 - 12:40 AM

I agree wholeheartedly with both of you, 907ie and JNKish. These two latest articles of Jeff's are two of the most revelatory and revelant that I can remember reading in a long time. I remember years ago when TFP was on the old discussion board that we would debate whether the Russian leadership was driven primarily by the ideology of Marxism/socialism or by the basic lust for power and conquest. Victor Kalashnikov's uniquely qualified ideas and analysis on this subject puts the issue to rest, I believe.

Perhaps from the very beginning, Russian leadership realized the initial blush of ideological fervor could not carry the Revolution very far into actual implementation without the heavy-handed encouragement of the Cheka, the secret police. People do not react favorably when they're told they no longer own their land, or any other property. Marxism/socialism never did have anything to offer the world in practical terms, just vague promises about a workers' paradise, while delivering an actual hell on earth. If a nation basically has nothing to "sell" that anyone wants to "buy", how can it prosper or even survive the inevitable "bankruptcy"? This is why its military and its military's strategy can be the only source of survival and power for the Russian State. As Kalashnikov has pointed out, the continuity of mindset between Soviet leaders and Russian leaders shows us what the Russian State will do to survive and prosper. Nothing has changed since the overt phase of the Cold War except America's suicidal urge to abandon national security.


The single minded behavior of Russia does indeed promote the idea that it is being ruled by a dictat of a single dictator of sorts. The way it makes decisions and looks for missions at times, seemingly confused, promotes that reality that this whole Duma is a sham job.

There was a shift from the Cold War, and it is into a worse war, but an actualy activated war of harassment against the US. They are right, we still raise the specter of a Cold War but the catch is that they have moved beyond and into an active preparatory war phase and battle meant to soften us out.

The communist ideology is a matter of morale for leftist and perverted politicians. Instead of resigning themselves to the fact that they are incapable of self governing as peasants, God forbid for Leninists, they have to find a philosophy that will make them believe in themselves as being fit and not needing a leader to explain things to them. It's how the Kremlin has perverted the Democratic party beyond recognition and is now attacking corrupt right wingers with.

For the Kremlin, however, it is a matter of mission and mission focus.

When Saddam got to power, he did not want to scare the world through an overt coup of the Baath party. He moved to power without declaring himself so, in a sort of reverse of the perestroika deception. He became the "body guard" and called the shots. Then started putting on International recognition stripes such as getting the rank of General and other diplomatic recognitions. Then, when it was fait accompli, he walked in the office with a gun and deposed the puppet outright. The key is to recognize that these people rise by trying to not shock people about their ambitions.

Thus communism is ideed a use for a cover ploy of power, and, embeded with it, a sort of mission of maintaining this power and keeping morale is needed. It's also a way to make the enemy readable, to find out what it wants and make it manipulable, while keeping your own wants and needs unexpressed or unfelt.

Later on sin and what not got him confused about his next mission. He did not want the Russians on his back so he independentized. He attacked Iran but did not want to upset the leftist of the world too much, so he made peace with them. Then he went on to focus on Israel, or even Kuwait. Once in power, then what? That was what doomed Saddam in the end because he could not trust the US to back him up all the way on Iran either, for some reason.

I also believe that FDR had a deal with Stalin and the Soviet Union before Hitler attacked or Yalta, a secret deal. The warrior nations do not want to be at war while we sit on the sidelines. They want us to boggle into a Vietnam while they settle scores with each other, protected by us. It's a gang rite. FDR had to pick sides and what not. Japan helped in that respect. China might also be the next "Yellow boogeyman" in the future while at the same time we will be preaching war against bigots on some other realm. Meanwhile the muslims have not awakened yet their next echelons of triksters and charities and false dissidents, only AlQaeda has. The muslims will not be let of having the money on us and then kill us, but they will by and by do this and that for the Soviet side. Their self dissolution in their narcissism is key ice breaker factor for forcing us into some kind of 3rd world war and treaty shaping: with an effective missile defense means Iran cannot be used, tsk tsk tsk...

#348 markolinux

markolinux

    Member

  • Admin
  • 583 posts

Posted 31 January 2011 - 10:13 AM

A recent response by Jeff to a question I asked via email, which he gave permission to post here. I will post my original email, along with his response.

--+-------

Hi Jeff,

Just wondering if you have any more thoughts to add to what you've already said regarding the story about Obama's eligibility to be president, via the interview with Tom Fife, and whatever you've written in articles.

I'm thinking that this could still be a fairly major "kick" that the enemy uses from inside the US to take us to a state of breakdown. The economic situation is grave, as well, and we ride a narrow, treacherous path among the mountains of debt. But just yesterday I saw in the headlines that Hawaii isn't going to produce a birth certificate, because it either doesn't exist or they can't find it or something rather definite like that. Today I read that several states are planning on clarifying their eligibility requirements for all candidates running for office in the next election cycle - requirements that, if in place in 2000, would have probably kept Obama from making it on the ballot in that state.

Jeff's response:

I have investigated this birther issue. I actually interviewed Orly Taitz, former Soviet citizen, and lawyer-dentist. I could not use the interview because she was so crazy. She seemed very rational when I spoke with her for an hour two days before the actual interview. When recording the show she turned into a raving conspiracy hound, howling at the moon. She believes in the Illuminati, etc. This is strange coming from a Soviet who immigrated to Israel around 1981. Jews do not readily believe in a Masonic conspiracy (which traditionally alludes to a Jewish-Masonic conspiracy). From previous research I understand that everyone allowed to leave to Israel from Soviet Moldova at that time had to accept GRU training and agree to recruitment by GRU or KGB. I recall there was a 6-week mandatory GRU course required to emigrate. I have this from two sources (people who knew the process at the time -- a Moldovan and a Ukrainian). I am not saying she is an agent, since my information may not cover all cases, but this whole thing raises a red flag -- so to speak. The birther issue itself is pure poison. What could be more divisive or harmful than an illegitimate president? Or the myth of such a president! How would the Constitution survive such a blow?

In all this, my chief concern centers on the Tom Fife story. This story says Obama is directly connected to the Communist Party Soviet Union. First of all, his parents met in a Russian class in Hawaii. Why were they studying Russian? This is not normal for someone's parents? Obama's mother was a radical who hated the United States, his father was an African socialist. Yet the waters here are too murky.

I see that Limbaugh and even Chris Mathews have wondered publicly at the president's reluctance to prove his American birth. What is it all about? There is a definite ongoing effort to split our country into two hostile camps, and Russia's hand is detectable through agents like the Laroushites and Alex Jones and the "Truthers" -- people like Michael Ruppert and Ted Gunderson. These people have ties to Moscow. Ruppert was celebrated in Moscow a few years back, and spent a period of exile in Venezuela.

What we need is an army of researchers to dig dirt and get the facts on Ruppert, Gunderson and the disruptive Right wing agents of Moscow that remain unidentified. I don't know about the birthers, like Taitz, but we should be on guard. Are they like the Truthers, who are a clear case? I wish we knew more. My former boss at WND is an affirmed birther. He may be onto something after all. I simply don't know. Many birther claims I examined were bogus, but a few did leave me scratching my head.

#349 Rocky

Rocky

    Member

  • Members
  • 396 posts

Posted 05 February 2011 - 12:32 PM


JRN said: "In all this, my chief concern centers on the Tom Fife story. This story says Obama is directly connected to the Communist Party Soviet Union." For those who haven't heard the story, here it is. Scary.

The First Time I Heard of Barack

by Tom Fife

During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid 1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow, Russia, in the process of starting a software development joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community. One of the men in charge on the Russian side was named V. M.; he had a wife named T.M.

V. was a level-headed scientist while his wife was rather deeply committed to the losing Communist cause – a cause she obviously was not abandoning.

One evening, during a trip early in 1992, the American half of our venture were invited to V. & T.’s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States. The party went well and we had the normal dinner discussions.

As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge – one her husband tried to quietly rein in.

The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:

“You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven’t you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice-president and you didn’t do it.”

The general response went something along the lines that you don’t vote for someone just because of their sex. Besides, you don’t vote for vice-president, but the president and vice-president as a ticket.

“Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon.”

The consensus we expressed was that we didn’t think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or she black or not.

“What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a Communist?”

The out-of-the-blue remark was met by our stares. She continued, “Well, you will; and he will be a Communist.”

It was then that the husband unsuccessfully tried to change the subject; but she was on a roll and would have nothing of it. One of us asked, “It sounds like you know something we don’t know.”

“Yes, it is true. This is not some idle talk. He is already born and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of Presidents. He is what you call “Ivy League”. You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be your President.”

She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly – as though all were foregone conclusions. “It’s all been thought out. His father is not an American black so he won’t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a Communist. He’s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.”

We sat there not knowing what to say. She was obviously very happy that the Communists were doing this and that it would somehow be a thumbing of their collective noses at America: they would give us a black president and he’d be a Communist to boot. She made it quite obvious that she thought that this was going to breathe new life into world Communism. From this and other conversations with her, she always asserted that Communism was far from dead.

She was full of little details about him that she was eager to relate. I thought that maybe she was trying to show off that this truly was a real person and not just hot air.

She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature. “Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet.”

At one point, she related some sort of San Francisco connection, but I didn’t understand what the point was and don’t recall much about that. I was just left with the notion that she considered the city to be some sort of a center for their activity here.

Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I made a comment: “If I remember correctly, ‘Barack’ comes from the Arabic word for ‘Blessing.’ That seems to be an odd name for an American.” She replied quickly, “Yes. It is ‘African’”, she insisted, “and he will be a blessing for world Communism. We will regain our strength and become the number one power in the world.”

She continued with something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for Communism. America would have to be converted to Communism and Barack was going to pave the way.

So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove?

Well, it’s definitely anecdotal. It doesn’t prove that Obama has had Soviet Communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is very important. It shows that Soviet Russian Communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed Communist to pave the way for their future. This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed.

Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30+ years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.


Here's an interview.

#350 SJL

SJL

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,371 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 February 2011 - 01:21 PM

A recent response by Jeff to a question I asked via email, which he gave permission to post here. I will post my original email, along with his response.

--+-------

Hi Jeff,

Just wondering if you have any more thoughts to add to what you've already said regarding the story about Obama's eligibility to be president, via the interview with Tom Fife, and whatever you've written in articles.

I'm thinking that this could still be a fairly major "kick" that the enemy uses from inside the US to take us to a state of breakdown. The economic situation is grave, as well, and we ride a narrow, treacherous path among the mountains of debt. But just yesterday I saw in the headlines that Hawaii isn't going to produce a birth certificate, because it either doesn't exist or they can't find it or something rather definite like that. Today I read that several states are planning on clarifying their eligibility requirements for all candidates running for office in the next election cycle - requirements that, if in place in 2000, would have probably kept Obama from making it on the ballot in that state.

Jeff's response:

I have investigated this birther issue. I actually interviewed Orly Taitz, former Soviet citizen, and lawyer-dentist. I could not use the interview because she was so crazy. She seemed very rational when I spoke with her for an hour two days before the actual interview. When recording the show she turned into a raving conspiracy hound, howling at the moon. She believes in the Illuminati, etc. This is strange coming from a Soviet who immigrated to Israel around 1981. Jews do not readily believe in a Masonic conspiracy (which traditionally alludes to a Jewish-Masonic conspiracy). From previous research I understand that everyone allowed to leave to Israel from Soviet Moldova at that time had to accept GRU training and agree to recruitment by GRU or KGB. I recall there was a 6-week mandatory GRU course required to emigrate. I have this from two sources (people who knew the process at the time -- a Moldovan and a Ukrainian). I am not saying she is an agent, since my information may not cover all cases, but this whole thing raises a red flag -- so to speak. The birther issue itself is pure poison. What could be more divisive or harmful than an illegitimate president? Or the myth of such a president! How would the Constitution survive such a blow?

In all this, my chief concern centers on the Tom Fife story. This story says Obama is directly connected to the Communist Party Soviet Union. First of all, his parents met in a Russian class in Hawaii. Why were they studying Russian? This is not normal for someone's parents? Obama's mother was a radical who hated the United States, his father was an African socialist. Yet the waters here are too murky.

I see that Limbaugh and even Chris Mathews have wondered publicly at the president's reluctance to prove his American birth. What is it all about? There is a definite ongoing effort to split our country into two hostile camps, and Russia's hand is detectable through agents like the Laroushites and Alex Jones and the "Truthers" -- people like Michael Ruppert and Ted Gunderson. These people have ties to Moscow. Ruppert was celebrated in Moscow a few years back, and spent a period of exile in Venezuela.

What we need is an army of researchers to dig dirt and get the facts on Ruppert, Gunderson and the disruptive Right wing agents of Moscow that remain unidentified. I don't know about the birthers, like Taitz, but we should be on guard. Are they like the Truthers, who are a clear case? I wish we knew more. My former boss at WND is an affirmed birther. He may be onto something after all. I simply don't know. Many birther claims I examined were bogus, but a few did leave me scratching my head.


A right winger watches the history channel, parses the truth, from omissions, from errors/lies and elaborates.

The Faux Rightist watches the 300s and learns self congratulating lessons of fights against homosexual bolshevicks from it.

The difference is that the Faux Rightist has a tendency of "positive" smug self satisfaction that is on the fantasy driven level. He is very much after racial issues and birth issues. In fact liberals and leftists have similar fantasies, but on the romantic gothic level of things, with imageries of "sad cops" who look desirable because they lost a loved one. Hence profit for left wing prostitutes and pimps is rooted in gothic poetry and fantasy of profit of the death of the innocent for indulging in sexual and corrupt behaviors. Is everything about sex? No, it is about corruption in general, really.

Also, note the implementation of useful triggers of unrest on these issues. If this then that, if not this. The choices are pre-given and pre-prepared for us between being pro communist or pro-manipulable Hitlers who will fail again and again to support right wing causes abroad and instead adopt insular attitudes of superiority that will wager on imperialism and futile sabotaged invasions. The way Hitler was dragged into Europe is the way Napoleon was used to drag Europe into the French dysfunctional way and the way America was dragged into Vietnam, preset for failure in policy and ability etc...

Our preachers who preach us to go on missions in Africa when they simply are capable to keep our own pants clear here at home are equaly dangerous too. So, strangely, isolationism and Free Trade New WOrld ORder stuff at the hands of incompetent pricks coming out of college are equaly dangerous and alienating in the end.

Who is the builder of those IEDs? The Soviet manipulators of course. That China and Russia might fear fighting each other later on without a Western arbiter might be an issue, but we have abandoned leadership in this area, leaving even Japan and SOuth Korea to ponder their own nuclear arsenal in the face of a weak AMerica and an obviously belligerent CHina - which is not lost on these asians' domination minded people.

In any case, those who do not believe that man is more than an animal, capable of growth throughout a life time, and not a set animal of great or weak strength, but whose value lies in his "suple" or "souple" abilities, are the problem - be they Nazies believing in a superior set race or a communist believing in the universal nature of man as being an animal part of the set machinery of the universe.

Man is a creation made to make God think, to challenge God. It can do it positively and cooperatively or it can do it to exploit it as a weakness or neediness of God, in complete self alienation and self destruction of true suicidal nature - and not mere punctuation of himself as a tool at the hands of a tyrant in cowardly dog way, protecting the flesh at the expense of the spirit (another form of suicide, utilitarianist, while "alive")

#351 watchman92

watchman92

    Member

  • Members
  • 726 posts

Posted 07 February 2011 - 01:08 AM

I think that it basically comes down to whether Fife is a liar or not. Think about all the details he says.

If he is a liar, then the waters are as murky as they were before.

If he is an honest man simply retelling his tale, then that means we have a FOREIGN AGENT inside the White House, furthering Russian objectives and working to destroy the United States.

Watching Obama's actions, it seems pretty clear to me.

#352 NBT Truth

NBT Truth

    Member

  • Members
  • 780 posts

Posted 15 February 2011 - 06:41 PM

I think that it basically comes down to whether Fife is a liar or not. Think about all the details he says.

If he is a liar, then the waters are as murky as they were before.

If he is an honest man simply retelling his tale, then that means we have a FOREIGN AGENT inside the White House, furthering Russian objectives and working to destroy the United States.

Watching Obama's actions, it seems pretty clear to me.


President Obama's stimulus spending has catapulted us into a black hole of debt which we will never be able to extract ourselves from. Given his level of education, he should know better. Therefore one can't help but be suspicious, and give credence to the idea that he knows exactly what he's doing....

#353 Shawna11

Shawna11

    Member

  • Admin
  • 810 posts

Posted 16 February 2011 - 02:18 AM

Jack Cashill is writing a book called Deconstructing Obama which purports to take apart and examine the elements of a life story that is more artifice than fact.

A friend of mine heard Cashill interviewed on the radio recently; he said he's had 4 different investigators digging into the question of "Who is Barack Obama's real father?" and has received 4 different answers! He seems more and more convinced that Obama's "official" life story is largely mythological, much of it cribbed from the Bill Ayers' life and loves (and in fact, probably written mostly by Ayers as well).

http://www.wnd.com/i...p?pageId=253097

#354 Jason

Jason

    Member

  • Members
  • 170 posts

Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:54 PM

Here is an interesting little fact to chew on. In order to provide support (say security, communications, etc) for the POTUS, one must obtain not only a TS/SCI, but additional background checks known as a Yankee White. We have not had a POTUS who would himself been able to obtain such a clearance since Bush 41. This needs to be corrected by state legislatures.

#355 SJL

SJL

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,371 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 February 2011 - 06:36 PM

Here is an interesting little fact to chew on. In order to provide support (say security, communications, etc) for the POTUS, one must obtain not only a TS/SCI, but additional background checks known as a Yankee White. We have not had a POTUS who would himself been able to obtain such a clearance since Bush 41. This needs to be corrected by state legislatures.

JRN's latest seem to indicate that now Zero's strategy is to claim stupidity and ignorance about what is going on. It's like when some Germans claimed they did not know. Of course they did. We are in the cop out zone and this sort of irrational behavior of letting such people take power as a form of culture is furtherance of the irrationality of our age, like, "he/she did not know", yet fully knew what fed it.

The KGB is like a one eyed feeding monster amongst blind or pretend-blind sheeps. The world of reason is gone and we only have predators and preys as a form of culture.

#356 SJL

SJL

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,371 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 19 February 2011 - 08:01 AM

Strategiccrisis.com is having some bogus posts. It seems to be under a cyber drone attack.

#357 JRNyquist

JRNyquist

    Member

  • Admin
  • 88 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 February 2011 - 04:06 PM

Jack Cashill is writing a book called Deconstructing Obama which purports to take apart and examine the elements of a life story that is more artifice than fact.

A friend of mine heard Cashill interviewed on the radio recently; he said he's had 4 different investigators digging into the question of "Who is Barack Obama's real father?" and has received 4 different answers! He seems more and more convinced that Obama's "official" life story is largely mythological, much of it cribbed from the Bill Ayers' life and loves (and in fact, probably written mostly by Ayers as well).

http://www.wnd.com/i...p?pageId=253097


I wish I'd heard Cashill's recent interview with Michael Medved. The whole question of Obama's real biography, versus the official mythology, is fundamental to interpreting the current presidency. Who is Obama? I'd like to know more about Obama's mother's ideology, and his grandfather's political opinions. In the radio program where I interviewed Tom Fife, I also interviewed a lady blogger from Chicago who ran into Bill Ayers at the Ronald Reagan airport. The lady blogger reported that Ayers told her he had written Obama's first book. This is exactly what Cashill says. I want to get my hands on Cashill's book and find out the reasons for his speculation. Two months ago I read Dinesh D'Souza's book on Obama. There were a few good insights, but all-in-all, D'Souza left me unsatisfied. D'Souza seems to be arguing that Obama is not a communist. The explanation is that Obama is anti-colonialist. But anti-colonialism is not necessarily a separate thing unto itself. It may also be part of a overall communist world view. And D'Souza doesn't attempt to deal with the role of Ayers, or the role of Frank Davis (a communist mentor) in Obama's life. And now for the punch line, which brings us up-to-date: Bill Ayers was supposedly in Egypt for a period of weeks or months prior to the revolution that has taken place there. Add to this the president's determination to "push" Mubarak out in favor of "democracy." I cannot help an instinctive "aha!" The revolutionary communist Ayers, the Marxist-Leninist terrorist Ayers, appears on our radar yet again. Is he not a portent? If Ayers has anything to do with events in far-away places, they'd better disperse the up-swelling street mob with a big gun, after the fashion of Bonaparte, lest they hear the demand from afar, from the White House, to "step down" or lose all foreign assistance. The double-undermining of America's position in the world is thereby effected, with Obama's supposed ghost-writer on the spot -- a ghost-revolutionary, if you will. There remains a vague after-taste of revolutionary orchestration. But who dares talk about it?

#358 watchman92

watchman92

    Member

  • Members
  • 726 posts

Posted 20 February 2011 - 04:38 PM

Jose the Caller also told Michael Savage that Bill Ayers was a member of the Venezuelan Security Services. I would not be surprised if there was some link originating from Russia, through Venezuela, to Ayers.

#359 kulthur

kulthur

    Member

  • Members
  • 348 posts

Posted 20 February 2011 - 10:57 PM

why is bill ayers still a free man? the fbi has to have badly fumbled something along the way, this guy is just a spoiled, possibly childhood-abused, asshole, it's obvious that he's an agent - a "friend" - of the Comintern. everyone can appreciate what the venceremos brigade was. you can read the fbi files of the SDS visits to czechoslovakia and cuba. and we're supposed to believe that obama is just some slightly left of center milquetoast who, through his mildness, will bring all nations to comity?

cmon. no one would believe something like that if it involved their car, their house or their computer. but they accept such things in politics? depresssing.

#360 JerichoFan

JerichoFan

    Member

  • Members
  • 22 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mid-Atlantic

Posted 22 February 2011 - 08:52 PM

why is bill ayers still a free man? the fbi has to have badly fumbled something along the way, this guy is just a spoiled, possibly childhood-abused, asshole, it's obvious that he's an agent - a "friend" - of the Comintern. everyone can appreciate what the venceremos brigade was. you can read the fbi files of the SDS visits to czechoslovakia and cuba. and we're supposed to believe that obama is just some slightly left of center milquetoast who, through his mildness, will bring all nations to comity?

cmon. no one would believe something like that if it involved their car, their house or their computer. but they accept such things in politics? depresssing.


It either serves some purpose to let him run free (best case scenario: surveillance and intel collection) -- or the law enforcement and intelligence communities are incompetent, disinterested, or compromised.

I'm convinced that half the country is actually leftist/socialist without realizing it; that half the country is seditious in thought if not in deed; and that the remaining half just can't do simple math (which would explain the national debt).